Tuesday, 30 August 2016

Racial Preference

Today, as I started writing my Honours thesis on SJWism, I came upon the words 'racial preference'. It puzzled me. After all, people have sexual preferences, and if I accept that one can be gay or bisexual or pansexual or a unicorn, then I can speak of this freely.

Take Norman. He has sexual feelings for men. His society tells him it is all right for him to prefer men sexually and so has a romantic relationship with another man. He chooses this, and he can also not control his sexual impulse he has for other men. He will say, despite his obvious choice of being with a man romantically, that he cannot control it, and that he did not choose it.

He has a lack of agency, which he gives up to lust as a sacrificial offering. He cannot control it and therefore, people must accept the way he is or else they are 'scared' of him. Hmm...

Why should people, then, not be proud of their racial preferences? Why is it that if a white person desires to be surrounded by other white people because 1. they cannot control their kinship for other whites and 2. they simply prefer it then they must reform the way that they are against their will for the sake of multiculturalism and the removal of all racial bias?

Why must those who have a positive racial bias toward their own race be forced to reject their nature? It's simple: because it is not 'natural' to have racial preferences to 'society', but a prejudice. Would a gay man, however, be called prejudice against a woman because he does not force himself to have sexual feelings for her? No. He would be respected for loving other men and encouraged by liberals to feed his fetish (all right, I'll be inclusive) to satisfy his sexual hunger the way he sees fit. Having a positive racial bias does not hurt anyone. The exclusion of women in that man's life is not seen as misogynistic or unfair to women, but simply a preference. If women were oppressed by men in American society (like, actually oppressed) would they then think that male homosexuality would be a sexual prejudice toward women? I have heard people say that if they find black women ugly they are racist. I know that in the middle east, men have very strong fraternal bonds between themselves, but if they let that bond turn to lust, then they are in sin and must be killed.

I do think that if one gender has more power, they have more kinship.

Friday, 26 August 2016

Hillary's 'Alt-Right' Speech Transcript

Thank you, Reno! It’s great to be back in Nevada…
My original plan for this visit was to focus on our agenda to help small businesses and entrepreneurs.
This week we proposed new steps to cut red tape and taxes, and make it easier for small businesses to get the credit they need to grow and hire.
Because I believe that in America, if you can dream it, you should be able to build it.
We’ll be talking a lot more about our economic plans in the days and weeks ahead.
But today, I want to address something I hear from Americans all over our country.
Everywhere I go, people tell me how concerned they are by the divisive rhetoric coming from my opponent in this election.
It’s like nothing we’ve heard before from a nominee for President of the United States.
From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia.
He’s taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over one of America’s two major political parties.

Wednesday, 24 August 2016


The two worst things you can subject an idea to is to romanticize it or to fetishize it. Fetish in this definition is "something irrationally revered" (OED), which I will explain furthermore by saying that is it often put into action in order to gain more from it than what it has to offer. It is a projection of the flesh onto the spirit, it is a delusion, a perversion, and it usually leads to obsession. The most common association to fetish that humans face is the fetishism of food and sexuality.

Romanticization is "To make romantic or idealized in character; to make (something) seem better or more appealing than it really is; to describe, portray, or view in a romantic manner." (OED) Things that are romanticized are usually horrible and disturbing evils (and sometimes fetishes) in order to sidle through the human's natural gut-reactions to evil, tweak their moral compass and invade their mind. Common romanticizations that I've witnessed that are the most disturbing are Japanese anime collections called Loli, of small female children willingly open to be sexual with adult men. The romanticization of female children as whimsical, innocent and pure beings makes it all the more easy to create a pedophilic narrative in one's mind that seems harmless and caring instead of perverted and predatorial. Thug life is often romanticized as well, making it seem noble and honourable when it is clearly more like a forced engagement of evil, violence and ultimately rape and murder. 

Saturday, 20 August 2016

Father's Milk

So apparently men can lactate. I've heard feminists use this to claim that one day men will help women childrear so they can both have a career and tend to their children (instead of you know... educating their children and caring about them). So, the woman will give up her precious breastfeeding time to her father so that their babe can do the more abhorrent thing of all:

"drink milk from their father's teet"

I said this out loud just now to my husband and felt sickened. There are so many levels of wrong to this, and I'm sure I don't have to state why. There are perhaps men who have an anomaly, perhaps a lot of estrogen, perhaps a breast that can excrete 'milk', but let's be clear, this small amount of lactation is not a sustainable childfeed that can nourish any living thing. Also, men who stimulate their nipples when their child is born in hopes to give it its milk is... must I go on?

Just to state how it'll never be sustainable, I will say this: Women need to be constantly breastfeeding during the first weeks, if they stop, their baby will need formula. Each ounce of anything your newborn ingests in that time reduces the woman's milk production, which can be the detriment of the entire production and will slowly recover, but not without formula or getting in cereals far too early for the baby to properly digest them. The mother needs to breastfeed. The mother also needs to breastfeed in order to bond with her child. Mothers have been known to be the number one childkiller, especially when it comes to babyshaking or babysmothering (I'm convinced than mothers kill their children in their cribs and blame is on SIDS). As a mother, I realize that I tend to go insane with my child around acting like a rascal and I need control. I cannot imagine a feminist-type woman and her temperament with a child. Oh, never mind, her children are all ashes in the bottom of the biohazardous garbage disposal at the hospital. But if she would decide not to be a deadbeat murderous woman-child, than she would likely kill her son out of him just... being a boy! My boy is truly a boy. He hits and he pinches and bites and tests me and plays me with coy glances, but he's evident about his intentions and outspoken. He's also sweet and tender and kind, and that's the most of him. But his worse brings the worst out of me. I still breastfeed him, (he's 19 months) and it is a time we both enjoy. The love between a woman and her child is Eros, hence Aphrodite and Cupid (Eros), the baby god. It is a moment I share with my son, that bonds us, that cleans our slate of anger and frustration, and brings us back to our sweet familial love. Women should not be ashamed of feeling erotically connected with their babies, for this love is not lust. It is not fetish, and it is not fueled by sin or negativity. It is serenity and calm. God blessed the female with a release of prolactin during breastfeeding which helps her bond to her child so that she can be eased of her frustrations and be happy.

Why renounce it?

Because you want to spend time with human transactions, with selfish, greed-based competition? Because you want to be men? You force the woman in a place where she does not belong generally, and as a trade-off, you attempt to force men to do the unthinkable, breastfeed their children. I read this in this article and I was sickened.

"Diamond points out, however, that with the societal norm of fathers helping to rear their young, male milk production could actually be to our advantage, especially with all the career women trying to balance the demands of job and family. Why else would men still have nipples?"

You can make your own comments. I don't have to add anything else but my subjective emotions and thoughts which all relate to a sense of deep unease and disgust. Men can lactate, all right, it's weird and I admit that it's probably true, but to make any talking point concerning the socialization of breastfeeding men is ridiculous and absolutely out of the left-field. It's this obsessions with trying to prove that men can be women and women can be men, which is untrue. So untrue. It has taken me 8 years of being with my spouse in order to understand a shred of what men are, and I'm still working out what it's like to be a woman--that was greatly aided by the arrival of my beloved son.

But please, already that I don't want to live on this planet anymore, I want any woman who brings this up to be the most ridiculed, the most shame-ridden being on the face of the earth. Any comment that would land you in jail in the Middle East deserves at least humiliation here in the West.

Thursday, 18 August 2016

Bringing Back: Etiquette Schools

In attempt to rebuild a healthy, homosocial gathering for young women and girls, I believe it would be a wise thing to bring back etiquette schools. They are now few and often tailored to modern society. I, as a hardcore traditionalist, believe that we can do-away with much of social media and technology and their failings. I do believe young women (17+) may wish to have a Facebook or a cell phone, but I would recommend that they do not use them for anything else than communication with the world. There is no need for them to be toxified by Buzzfeed, Twitter, Tumblr, Yahoo, MSN, etc. If any website would be acceptable for young women these days, it would be YouTube (although it's being censored) Reddit (in moderation) or Pinterest. Still, I do believe parents should be involved in their children's feast of ideas, asking them if they have seen something disturbing or that they are questioning. But I digress.

Society today is secular, highly immoral, unconcerned with spirituality, uncouth and ultra-liberal. In order to counteract this 'Slut Culture' of fallen women, we must salvage the younger generation and make them once more into women with class and dignity. Christian, moral, elite, conservative girls might be able to be the future that will help this world return to Truth, morality, and peace. Instead of falling into despair in an eschatological depression, let us look into ways to row to shore the girls who will inevitably drive down the waterfall of sin.

Etiquette schools should focus mainly on:

(Indoor Activities)

Conversation, Socialization, Games, DIY, paperwork (taxes, etc), table manners, hosting, music, painting, sewing, cooking, canning, exercize and literature (as well as Bible Study).

These activities will create wonderful, sturdy, joyful girls who will see the value of being a housekeeper. This does not force them into being a wife and housekeeper, however, she should be free to go on to do some higher education if she so chooses (perhaps in medicine or education), but she will be suited well to her femininity and should not wish to be a man, or masculine more than her disposition might incline her to be.

(Outdoor Activities) might include:

Horseback riding, gardening, gathering, non-violent sports, swimming, and free play. 

I do believe girls should be left along in order to breed 'romantic' relationships with each other. Women can be very homosocial and intimate with each other, I believe this is why many of them fall into desiring to be sexual with each other, but I do find that falling into lust is immoral and breaks the potential for a perfect intimate friendship. Older girls and younger girls should be imaginative and play wonder games, make plays, read or invent stories with each other.

I believe etiquette schools could be made into summer camps. I would host one if I had the budget and location and well... girls who would like to to this, but the only problem is that the discipline that is needed is no longer tolerated in our society. We cannot shame and humiliate anymore, and by that, I don't mean it in a 'hazing' type of way. I mean it like, make them stand in a corner wearing a dunce hat, or such a thing. Humiliation can be done right, shaming is highly needed in order to correct false ways and return to a healthy social stigma. Will we ever see this? Likely not. But it's nice to imagine. I will keep dreaming in a positive light.

"To despair is to turn your back on God." Marilla Cuthbert

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Religious Extremism is not Religious Terrorism

I've been hearing this apologetic phrase recently, mainly coming from the regressive left and atheists, "religious extremism" or "religious extremist". They're often used to describe the motivation of a terrorist attack without implying that the person is a terrorist. For the normies out there, this does not equate to the dangerous ideology of Islam, but says that all religions can be extreme and can be murderous and can lead to terrorism. Clearly this is an understatement. Moderate Christians in this world are those who accept gay marriage and abortions. Fundamentalist Christians, or as they would say 'religious extremist Christians' will go to Pro-Life rallies, not accept homosexuality as a valid form of sexuality, and might even not use contraception. That's religious extremism.

What about Islam? Just the moderate Muslims agree with what ISIS is doing. They don't like homosexuals, at all, they want segregation, they don't think any other religion is legitimate and believe that many other races than their own are lesser. That's not even the extremists. In the extreme you have female genital mutilation, the murder of homosexuals, the rape of infidels, the murder of infidels, death for apostasy, child marriages and the list goes on.

Clearly this 'religious extremism' narrative the left is pushing is a form of Cultural Marxism, destroying the fabric of our society one uttered word of black magic at a time. It is an apology of the real terrorism that is threatening Europe, that is violently raping our beautiful Swedish and German women, that is reducing our populations through abortion, that is blinded by pride and the vehement hate of continuity, goodness, and the achievement of greatness. 

My posts will be short like this for a while, I'm on vacation! Have a beautiful deep summer, my Lords.

Friday, 5 August 2016

Morality: Restriction or Indulgence?

A critique of conservative stances on morality, or religious stances are that they are restrictions forced onto people by those who refuse to accept their differences. A preacher with homosexual feelings will adamantly obsess over the passages in the Bible that claim homosexuality to be wrong because it valorizes his work of suppressing and sublimating his feelings into God. But this is a subjective view. Sublimating lust into God is difficult and is part of an ascetic life. In our corrupt society, it's difficult for those who struggle with lust because they are bombarded with porn, softcore porn, child pornification, basically there is sex and lust everywhere one looks. In the end, it doesn't really matter how people see this 'theory of moral restrictions' because their view is subjective. A subjective view of a subjective view is pretty weak and useless when we are on a quest toward finding an objective morality.

The Paradoxes of the Christian NRx

As a Christian in the Alt-Right, I've been facing a few personal moral issues. The first is my wrath. I refuse to be saddened about the issues that have happened, sadness brings me nowhere right now. I've wallowed in depression long enough, but I find myself replacing this sadness with anger. This anger breeds resentment, self-hatred, contempt and pride. I find myself having to realign myself, often with the psalm (36:10): "Be still, and know that I am the Lord." I find myself rebelling against God's authority, questioning its legitimacy and finding myself ill and disgusted, which makes me think I've gone too far in my ideologies.

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

Mothers are Women, Girls are Girls

When I was pregnant, two years ago, I told a woman in my class that I really felt like I was becoming a woman. She looked at me funny and said: "Surely you don't mean that women need to have children to be women...?"
I felt undermined and insulted, because she was a feminist and I knew what she stood for but not completely at the time. I had to be subdued. It bothered me.